Running Windows on the Mac

by Dennis Howlett on June 23, 2007

Paul Walsh contacted me asking which method of running Windows Vista works best on the Mac. Much depends on what you want to do. If you’ve bought a Mac to run Vista and Microsoft specific applications then Boot Camp makes sense. Boot Camp provides native support for Windows operating systems but it doesn’t provide easy file sharing between Mac and Windows applications. That means you have to reboot to get back to the Mac OS.

If you want to run Windows inside the Mac environment as a virtual machine then the best current choices are VMWare Fusion and Parallels Desktop v 3.0. You’d do this if you want to take advantage of the Mac’s emphasis on multi-media applications but still need access to Windows applications – which means 90-95% of the business community.

Neither VMWare nor Parallels is an ideal solution unless you have LOTS of RAM on the Mac – preferably 2GB. This is because virtual machines hog memory and have a habit of grinding to a halt, especially if you’re already running memory hungry applications on the Mac. I’ve run both and find that Vista loads quicker under Parallels than VMWare. But that may be a perceptual difference.

Both Parallels and VMWare provide seamless file sharing between Windows and Mac though I find Parallels to be a tad smoother. The biggest pain is that neither system seems to replicate the Mac keyboard commands. This only really matters when you’re doing stuff like cut ‘n’ paste where you use CMD-C/V in Mac and CTRL-C/V in Windows.

VMWare has some bizarre requirements. For example if you want Bluetooth support (and who doesn’t) then you’ll have to load Boot Camp drivers. A bit self defeating. It’s also in beta so you can be sure there are glitches. Check the VMWare forums for the latest status.

The latest Parallels upgrade has been a nightmare – which is why I’m writing this on Windows LiveWriter running on Vista under VMWare. When I upgraded from Version 2 to 3, Parallels failed to accept my legitimate license key. OK – glitches happen. But Parallels support is abysmal. I’m still waiting for an answer from tech support, two weeks after the problem emerged.

The good news is that you can trial these services free of charge to work out which is best for you. Boot Camp is free and it’s said will be included in the next version of the Mac OS. Parallels costs $79.99 ($50 upgrade) while VMWare is being sold at a pre-release price of $39.99 (post release: $79.99).

The bad news is that you will need to install your choice of Windows OS and applications under each virtual machine.

Why Bother?

As I was preparing to write this Sam Sethi questioned why you’d want to run Vista on a Mac. Good question. I have run XP on Parallels and found it to be more stable but as a tech junkie I’ve just got to have the latest and greatest. Regardless of its detractors, Vista IS an improvement on XP though I fully understand anyone who is reticent about installing until we see a Service Pack release.

Having said that, Microsoft Office 2007 is horrible. It’s taken more than two weeks of playing around with it to get the hang of the ribbon style task bars and even now I get confused. That means business cost. And I still detest ‘Track Changes’ in documents. A Wiki approach is far cleaner. But I digress.

Final Words

You pays your money and takes your choice. For the business user wanting the best of both Mac and Windows, there isn’t much to choose between Parallels and VMWare although tech heads will no doubt pick up on a bunch of stuff. If on the other hand you’ve bought a Mac as a high spec Windows box then Boot Camp is your choice.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • @Everyone - thanks for all the advice. I've learned a lot over the past few days (special thanks to Dennis) :)

    I've finally done it. I'm now running Parallels because my requirement is to run Vista as a virtual machine so I can take advantage of all the cool Mac stuff whilst running windows applications. Otherwise I might as well have gone for the Acer Ferrari. Ok, so that doesn't have the cool apple lit up on the back.

    I'm now awaiting my CD for office, so still running 2 machines. I really don't like the Mac's email client. Perhaps I should keep the 2 - 1 for facebook and 1 for twitter!
  • Mario - we went through that over the weekend via Twitter -:)

    Paul was getting horribly confused because BootCamp was insisting on booting to Vista. I'm not sure I'd bother UNLESS I wanted to run the Mac as a high end Vista box and even then there's enough SNAFUs to cause aggravation. But then it's all a matter of personal preference I suppose.

    Parallels/VMWare give me more options but as we both know, the performance penalty on a standard MBP demands a RAM upgrade.
  • Paul Walsh - just to clarify, you can use your Boot Camp Vista installation in Parallels. That way you can have the best of both worlds - you can boot into Vista from Boot Camp if you want to run it "natively", and can run it inside the Parallels virtual machine if you want to run OSX and Vista at the same time. So if you have a working Boot Camp install (nor sure if you do based on your earlier comments) there would be no reason to re-install for Parallels.

    If you do want to delete the Boot Camp Vista install, it can be a simple as starting the BootCamp Assistant, and delete the Windows partition.
  • krupo
    Vista: Latest? Yes. Greatest? Um...

    I know it's just a figure of speech, but I couldn't help take a dig at it.

    @Paul: uninstall? Piece of cake. "format c:\"

    Just remember your backups. ;)
  • Google apps are ok if you only need VERY basic functionality and are online all the time.

    Re uninstall - it can't be that easy to delete vista?
  • Sam: Respect - I'm very much of the same mind, especially as most of what I do is out in the cloud. However: LiveWriter beats the crap out of all other on/offline editors and from time to time I do need to test Wondows based apps for the other 90-95%. And yes - all that AV stuff is a pain in the derriere.

    Paul: Eeeek - uninstall in Mac is a doddle. Stop the program and drag to the Trash Bin. Easy peasy.
  • That was great. If only I had waited... now installing Vista on Bootcamp. Had I waited I would have gone for Parallels so I could use windows apps inside Apple.

    So, how difficult is it to get rid of what I've got and start over? Furthermore, I've installed 64bit by mistake as I should have installed 32bit. So, not a good start eh!
  • My point was what Vista/XP application do you need that you cannot also find natively on a MAC or a [better] alternative. Since moving over to the MAC I have not needed any of my old Windows Apps. I was already a Firefox and Google User (Gmail, GReader, Docs etc). Outlook and Office had long been consigned to the digital bin. Other apps like Google Earth, Skype, Last FM, joost, Twitterific, Wakoopa etc all are native on the Mac. I recently started playing with Adobe Air and Google Gears which are cross-platform to get RIA's.

    I would note it took me a few months to feel at home on my Mac - delete is fn + backspace - but now when I use a Windows machine it feels slow, even Vista. I did bootup parallels the other day to test a version of particls which is windows only.

    It made me laugh as the first thing that came up was for a service pack upgrade and the other was for anti-virus software. Welcome back to Windows. In the end Windows is collecting dust. I can't wait for Leopard and the new iPhone.

    As an ex-Microsoft evangelist, you couldn't pay me to go back and support the platform unlike a few A-list bloggers who took the Redmond shilling this week.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: