Comparison of book-keeping systems

by Dennis Howlett on May 24, 2007

An interesting question over at Any Answers:

I have a client who is looking to start a new business with an overseas investor and who wishes to carry out their own bookkeeping function.

She is prepared to learn how to use the software but does not know which one to use.

As a firm we recommend TAS software but she has been told that both Sage and Quickbooks are good.

I need to be able to advise my client of the various options that she has.

I am aware that there are many more packages out there which could be used and need to find somewhere that compares the functionality of each package and the various pros and cons.

Can anyone please point me to web site or article that can do this.

For interest only the package has to be able to deal with multi currency and if possible letters of credit.

Please – no postings saying “look at ABC software – its’s great”! I just need a site that compares all of the major packages.

There aren’t any. The comments are really interesting. The problem just about all packages present is that they’re built for accountants and not end users. Interfaces are way out of date and investment is low in bringing the ‘usual suspects’ up to date.

There’s a reason professionals go through a long period of training. Double entry isn’t easy but it’s like riding a bike. Once you get it, it’s simple. But…making sense of the entries is an altogether different matter. That’s why I’d say that a company in this situation needs to ensure it has a trained bookkeeper BEFORE it embarks on finding the right solution.

For what it’s worth – in the hands of a well trained person, there’s little to choose between the three mentioned but only Line 50 Financial Controller supports multi-currency. Now…depending on what you’d like to do, both FreshBooks and Blinksale natively support multi-currency for their billing applications. Given that the correspondent mentioned ‘new business’ and in new businesses, cashflow is king, then either of these would represent a good starting point.

If they have an overseas investor who will almost certainly want regular updates and they really do want to have ‘proper’ books and records AND they have someone who has a reasonable understanding of bookkeeping then Twinfield would be the thing to go for. On-demand and multi-currency as standard. That way, the overseas investor can see what’s happening in real-time. As can the UK-based professional accountant. Kills all birds with one stone. In other words Twinfield will solve the business problems rather than saddle all parties with a solution that doesn’t meet the central needs of the client in question.  

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Steve - yes - I do have strong views borne out of years watching CAs dishing out poor advice and being incapable of communicating with business except in accounting speak.
  • Steve
    Wow Dennis, you've got some pretty strong opinions there. I don't generally dismiss the business needs of my clients as you mention -- *they're* the reason I'm in business.
  • I like to deal in accuracy and facts. When I'm wrong, I freely put my hands up. If you read my biog, you'll see that I too have been around this business for many years.

    Multi-currency is really simple - the ability (in this context) to specify any kind of currency the selling business chooses.

    In an accounting application, it will (broadly) mean the ability to offer different currencies at invoicing and then handle the to the transaction according to IAS21. It's not rocket science in most situations.

    For most non-audited SMBs, IAS21 doesn't usually apply so common sense should prevail.

    There may of course be a special sales tax treatment to consider but that's another story and does not necessarily impact the billing application or the accounts but is a matter of practicality.

    The more substantive point is that most accountants seek a solution for themselves rather than to solve the business needs of their clients. That's the direction I prefer to steer people which is why I discussed the topic in the manner in which I did.
  • I don't mean to ruffle any feathers here and I suspect by the tone of your reply that you took offense to my comment. That wasn't my intension.

    Perhaps I don't understand what you mean by "multi-currency" in the context of a billing application. I've been around accounting software for decades and when someone says "multi-currency", certain functionality comes to mind, as it does with most other accounting professionals. What do you mean by it?

    Btw, I don't see my comment as specious. When I see something that does not appear to be correct, I speak up.
  • Thanks for your comments Sanjay but it is you who is in error.

    Read again - it says in respect of FB and Blinksale 'billing applications.'

    And where do I mention double entry in that context? I expect professional accountants to be able to work that out for themselves. Presumably you don't.

    But to conclude, you don't support multi-currency and as that appears to be a prime requirement, why did you bother bringing up these specious arguments?
  • This is not correct. Neither Freshbooks, nor Blinksale support multi-currency. They do, however, support the ability to select a currency symbol, but proper multi-currency requires a LOT more than that (i.e., the ability to bill a customer in another currency and account for it in your own.) Further, neither one is an accounting application, so throw out the double-entry bit as well.

    FWIW, my company doesn't support multi-currency either, and we don't intend to. At least not for now.

    SimplifyThis.com
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: