IE7 – a quick look

by Dennis Howlett on March 15, 2006

Ie72

I want to like it, I really do but I can’t quite get excited about it. Sorry Microsoft but IE7 (beta 2) won’t tempt me away from Firefox anytime soon. In its present incarnation, IE7 is too much of a me-too browser with not enough ‘edge’ to make me go ‘WOW.’ OK – so I’ve recently become a Mac bigot but I still have a Windows XP box (for emergencies :) ) OK – it is still a beta and some things will change, other things will improve. You can help by giving it a work out and feeding back to the development team. They do listen and they are working hard to make IE7 the success they aspire to. But in the interests of fairness, here’s my take.

If you’ve never used Firefox then IE7 would be a natural move. At first glance, the interface will confuse because it is very different to IE6 and its predecessors. You’ve got tabbed browsing (about time – much more efficient.) There is a particularly cute pane where you can view the tabs you already have open presented in a matrix. It gives you a quick visual check on what you’re looking at which is useful if, like me, you might have 20+ tabs open. It’s also fair to say that loading pages in IE7 is super fast compared with Firefox. Existing IE users will be very pleased with that as page loading in IE6 even on a decent broadband connection could be on the treacly side.

Ie71-1

Native RSS feed management is a shambles. On my machine, I found I had to find the ’subscribe to feed’ button on sites of interest, click it and then hit the ‘add to’ feeds icon. Why can’t I simply drag and drop the feed icon from the address bar (which doesn’t for some reason appear so I can’t drop it anywhere) into Favourites? Fortunately, the Pluck add-in, an RSS feed management thingy, takes away a lot of the pain of managing feeds – or at least it will when it works the way I expect it to. At present, clicking on an item of interest opens a new window – why doesn’t it simply expand the topic?

Microsoft is making a BIG security play. When you run the beta it checks to ensure you’ve got a legal copy of Windows software – fair enough – and runs an ‘anti-malicious’ software routine to ensure you’ve no sniffers or spyware. As an aside, the installation misled me into thinking it would restart the install after an initial reboot. No such luck – that will get ironed out as the beta moves forward. Won’t it?

IE7 includes anti-phishing capability which will be welcome to the unwary. Recent reports suggest US credit card companies and individuals are losing $50 billion each year through credit card fraud – a lot of which occurs as a result of phishing scams. the last figures I saw for the UK were £800 million per annum. I regularly receive a dozen or so phishing emails each week. As a comfort factor Microsoft’s work in this area is welcome but I was left wondering how long it will take the hacking community to find holes in IE7s security model. Past experience suggests – not long.

Bottom line? If you’re an IE user and that’s your business policy, you’ll initially be confused but will end up liking the interface. The on-ramp time could be a day or two, especially if you’re trying to grapple with the ins and outs of RSS. If that’s not an issue for your firm – great. On the other hand, you could always try Firefox and see what you could have. Not that I’m biased :)

Links

The Beta 2 access site is here

Lockergnome’s comments are here

The IE 7 development blog site is here where you can learn more about the key features and for the technically inclined, engage in esoteric discussions about the security model.

Technorati Tags: ,

  • Share/Bookmark
  • I used to prefer Macs myself but budget constraints—when you buy for a company—usually leaves us with PCs and Windows.
       However, I was quite turned off Macs simply because bad luck, technology and I seem to hop into bed together more often than not. Recently, on an OSX machine, it took three people and two tech support personnel 90 minutes to figure out how to burn a CD-ROM. The usual icon that appeared with a blank CD-ROM insertion did not appear, and we took that long to figure out why—before we could even burn the disc!
       The troubleshooting pages were the worst I had ever seen. Macs used to have wonderful help pages for their system, but now (based on this experience), they are written in a technojargobbledegookgonbabble that tells me little more than what I figured out myself.
       I am not surprised about your friend, as I am suspicious of anyone who writes troubleshooting pages. For I wonder if they relate to average Joes like me who always encounter the computer errors that no one else on the planet does! No troubleshooting page, except perhaps for those in programs of the past and Macs of old, is in plain English.
       As to Windows: it is largely no better and the software is even more quirky. I’ve had to reinstall various things so many times and trojans and virus attacks happen daily (though I am protected). We get bitchier tech support personnel. However, in Windows’ defence, I have yet to spend 90 minutes searching for a CD-ROM icon.
  • A friend of mine used to write the Windows troubleshooting pages for a BIG UK MSM title. He never managed to help me fix a single problem in 7 years...

    The last geek fest I went to, more than 50% were on Macs using FF - what incentive is there to deal with pesky Windows?
  • The weirdest things happen to me. I was the only MyLinkedinPowerForum member that I knew of that had the LinkedIn problem. I was also one of the few that could see the number of members on the home page, at a time when the feature was moved to another page for most other members.
       My concern, too, with the Mozilla browsers is that it was all OK up till Netscape 4·7. I’m on a pretty high-res screen, so the sudden changes in font while I read across the line get very noticeable. Interestingly, Firefox on Mac works fine with ligatures, quote marks and PostScript fonts (as does Safari), so someone inside the company knows how to do it—I wish they would simply serve Windows users.
  • I can't say I'm obsessed with ligatures, double quotes rendering and the like Jack. But then the tech world is full of one-offs to which there seems to be no solution. Linked-In - IE - doesn't work? That IS a new one.

    I came across Maxthon the other day but as I'm a confirmed Mac bigot and happy with FF (+ I have Safari) I couldn't bring myself to try yet another browser.
  • Interesting post, Dennis. I use IE6 and Maxthon (an independent browser using an IE engine, but it has tabs and a built-in RSS reader). Maxthon is more stable, and I have all the benefits of IE without the impracticalities. I think I might like this new IE7—I’ll stick with it till they figure out how to display fonts properly in the Mozilla browsers (see here for my complaint).
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: